Measuring 2011 on the Sticky Scale [Year In Review, Part 1]
Time for another Year In Review series! How did a year pass by so quickly? I guess when you’re busy watching dramas, time flies.
This is my fifth year (eek) doing this series, which means you basically know the drill by now. (You can refer to the year-ender tag to catch up on past posts.) You had a chance to vote for your favorites of 2011, and now it’s our turn to weigh in on the dramas we’ve seen.
This year I’ve tacked on a little stickymeter to my reviews, based on the discussion girlfriday and I had in our last podcast about “drama stickiness.” Which is to say, regardless of a drama’s quality, how much of an impression does it leave three, six, twelve months down the line?
As in past years, you’ll notice I didn’t watch every series that aired this year, despite my best attempts to swap sleep for dramas. Also, I’m not reviewing shows that I haven’t seen fully (with the exception of those that are still airing). However, looking over the series that’ll be covered in the upcoming Parts 2 through 5 of the review series, I can assure you that we’ve got a pretty good spread covered, so please keep an eye out for the posts to come.
Warning: There will be spoilers for each drama.
The following are in order of start date.:
Sticky Factor: Fun-sticky, like a piece of candy you’re happy to suck on till it’s gone, leaving a simple, sweet aftertaste.
Who doesn’t love a good underdog story?
“Dream High” took that concept, set it in an arts high school, and populated it with passionate, driven youngsters with stars in their eyes and dreams in their hearts — then upped the ante multiple times over by continually fiddling with the circumstances so that the underdog-victor dynamic was always in flux. While you may have been constantly rooting for the underdog, at any given moment that underdog might be any one of six characters.
It was a clever way to keep things evolving, ensuring that the relationships were always in development rather than sticking to a static good-evil dichotomy. The show trusted its viewership to follow the characters — even when they were dropping flowerpots on each other’s heads or calling each other third-rate. Thus it gave everyone more depth than you might expect of a fluff teen drama, as a result making it more than a fluff teen drama.
Casting is always tricky when you’re using more than one rubric of measurement. The need to balance the acting with the musical performance aspect led to a cast that was skewed more in favor of performance than I’d have liked, but there was enough solid acting to carry the show. Kim Soo Hyun became the heart of the drama with his shining sincerity, but you also had idols like Eunjung turning in solid portrayals of complicated personalities. True, not everyone was up to par, but the drama turned around those weaknesses on itself and incorporated them into the story, giving us meta-funny bits like Suzy’s hilarious Hye Mi Bot.
This drama was a case where the whole became more than a sum of its parts. While flaws could be spotted in a number of performances, together the kids had wonderful, heart-tugging chemistry. It was like feel-good magic. Who can forget Sam Dong proclaiming that Jin Gook’s underwear was shared property? Or Hye Mi figuring out how to get over her ego and learning what it meant to be a friend? Or Sam Dong crying desperately to Hye Mi to save him? Or the misfit mafia practicing dance moves in a jjimjilbang, under a hilariously eccentric Park Jin Young? The drama was full of rich development between these kids who went from being rivals to friends to emotional lifelines for each other.
Here’s where “Dream High” got it right — in the heartspace — because regardless of the flash and glitz of the musical numbers, or the big names of the producers, or the cameos by kpop stars, it didn’t use gimmicks as a crutch for content. The story, at its core, pulsed with real heart. For example, consider the show’s tackling of some touchy subjects, like the plotline involving a trainee being sexually assaulted by an agency president, who was subsequently vilified by the public as “asking for it.” The drama didn’t stop at mere mention of the issue, but used it as a launching pad for real emotional consequences as Baek Hee’s friends rallied around her and her teacher turned into a fierce mother hen in a way that still brings tears to my eyes. Speaking of whom, the teachers also displayed particular depth (and who could forget scene-stealing JYP, hilariously eccentric in his acting debut?). I love that we got misguided adults owning up to their mistakes, with Lee Yoon Ji fighting to reclaim her protégé’s integrity, whose loss she had facilitated in the first place.
Thanks to the success of “Dream High,” we’ve got the upcoming “Dream High 2” to look forward to, which premieres a year after its predecessor. If it likewise proves successful, we may be looking at a lot of Dream-filled Januarys to come.
Stickiness Quotient: Mildly sticky, but what’s left behind is just enough to remind you of the best parts while leaving behind less savory moments.
Have Kim Tae Hee or Song Seung Hun ever been this cute? Thanks to careers marked by attempts at more serious fare, both actors have managed to cultivate reputations as pretty faces with limited acting ability. Had they done “My Princess” earlier in their careers, perhaps that impression would be less pronounced, because what they lack in technical skill, they made up for in oodles of adorable chemistry.
Kim Tae hee was particularly on in “My Princess,” making her lost princess character a charming liar and cheat and cheerfully manipulating with a cheeky smile on her face. The princess-out-of-water storyline provided laughs, although I couldn’t help but wish for more substance to the story as the drama went on.
The story lacked meat. Because the royal intrigue was painted in simple strokes, this made for long stretches of intrigue ping-pong. The opposition strikes. The princess strikes back. The tension mounts as the president schemes, the hateful rival schemes, and the chaebol president schemes. With one Press Conference to rule them all.
Sadly, little effort was poured into presenting a villain who was either complex or sympathetic, either in terms of writing or acting. I’m pretty sure Park Ye Jin can do better, so it’s curious that her character was so flat. I’m not a fan of dramas that place the burden of conflict onto one person’s shoulders, because then you have problems that are contrived rather than organic to this world: With one toss of her asymmetrical hair, Park pulled strings, created trouble, and gummed up the works. If getting rid of one character solves a bulk of your problems, the drama’s really coasting on fumes.
The final stretch fell back on simple clichés to draw out the tension, leading to a romantic separation that didn’t make much sense. Thus the reunion, while sweet, lacked punch. It didn’t feel like a conclusion to their issues, just a temporary resolution for a temporary problem.
“My Princess” was a showcase for the adorable leads and their adorable courtship. In that sense it’s a sweet treat of a drama: Not much substance, but you pretty much know that going in. Let other dramas supply the meat ‘n’ potatoes; this one’s here for the dessert course.
Double-sided sticky tape: It’s both good-sticky and bad-sticky, depending on your vantage point.
“49 Days” was built on a compelling premise: If given a chance to look back on your life after it’s over, was it truly the life you thought it was? It also delivered the message that ultimately, the value of life can be judged on whether or not you were loved, and loved in return. And that love sometimes comes from unexpected places.
“49 Days” didn’t score all three points on my Ideal Drama Trifecta — writing, directing, acting — but it managed decently high points for two of the three. The acting was not one of this drama’s fortes, with appealing characters trumping some less-than-committed performances. (Thankfully, there was the cranky, scene-stealing Scheduler to save the day.) Even so, were I forced to choose between weak acting in a compelling story versus stellar acting in a bad story, I’d take a great story any day of the week, so it managed to come out ahead on that score.
What the show did accomplish, however, was providing a prime example of how to infuse a show with melodrama, tears, and villainy while steering clear of the dreaded makjang grab bag o’ clichés. With a gradually evolving mythology marking the heroine’s journey, the plot was constantly moving with new discoveries.
Frankly, the one time the drama did dip into the old bag of tricks with a birth secret was one of its weakest narrative moments, adding a late-game twist that felt unnecessary, given the richness of story it provided with its three tears journey, the heroine’s self-discovery, and the revelation of the Scheduler’s own tragic story. Those were fresh and compelling; no need to detract from their impact with the kind of convenient late-stage revelations that elicit more groans than satisfied sighs.
[Warning: Ending-related spoilers ahead] Alas, the ending left a bad taste in my mouth because it felt untrue to the spirit of the show. I suspect most viewers fell into one of two extremes: The Ending Rocked camp, and The Ending Betrayed Me camp. I am decidedly in the latter because killing the heroine at the eleventh hour, seemingly out of the blue, seemed to negate the entire message of the show that came before it. There were a number of dramas this year centering around the concept of death, and where others promised death and gave us life, this one promised life and gave us death. Sucker-punch indeed.
Stick or slick?: Thankfully cooked in a Teflon pan, so the flaws slide right off the surface.
Cable channel tvN did seriously step up their original drama programming in 2011 to compete with the big guns. “Manny” was the first of this new bunch (followed by I Need Romance, Birdie Buddy, and Flower Boy Ramyun Shop), and hinged upon a simple premise — a single word, even. Manny.
The show started off pleasant and easy to watch, with the manny (Seo Ji Suk) swooping in to save the day for a frazzled single mother (Choi Jung Yoon). There were flashes of potential with the manny developing a rapport with the woman’s son, an introverted little boy unable to express his abandonment issues or his longing for his absentee dad in healthy ways.
But because this is a Korean drama, romance also took up a starring role with the manny falling into a love triangle with his employer…and her sister. To be fair, it’s not unreasonable to suppose that bringing a hot, capable man into a household with two single women would lead to attraction, but one might expect that with the players being successful thirtysomething careerpeople, we’d get some maturity up in the mix. Strangely, we got adults acting like children which threatened to steal the focus away from the more interesting plots involving the actual children.
Those stories were where show was strongest, and “Manny” treated the children as well-developed characters in their own right, not props — hardly the case in K-dramaland unless we’re portraying a future hero’s origins. I appreciated the attention given to the children’s psychological development, with the ever-knowing manny paying close attention to how parents’ actions can stress their children in unexpected ways. Even their growth became a plot point, giving us hilarious exchanges like the ten-year-old growing flustered by disturbing new feelings for (Lee) Seung Gi oppa, rendering her unable to sleep or concentrate: “Mom, am I going crazy?”
With all the attention given to the kids, it’s curious that the manny was so undeveloped as a character. Basically, he was the perfect problem-saver, here to save the day.
Speaking of which, it’s unfortunate that the main pairing lacked romantic chemistry, which made the whole shebang feel like an empty affair. I couldn’t help thinking that it was thematically problematic to have the boy sublimate his desire for a father onto the manny… and then to have the manny poised to become his father, literally. I wanted the drama to present a way for the manny to address the boy’s fears in a healthy way, without “solving” them by becoming the dad. Perhaps the drama realized this as well, because they pulled back on that point, leaving us with a half-baked ending that didn’t really address the problem, insomuch as it skirted it entirely.
Because of the drama’s episodic format, there was a tendency to reset relationships to the default setting at the end of a dramatic arc. While I was happy to see the end to the angst, it was also odd to turn the dial back to normal afterward, like nothing had happened. It’s an indication of the prevailing maturity setting in the drama: On or Off, with little in between.
Stuck on you like an adorable manchild who refuses to give up on his noona-love.
Baby-Faced Beauty is a bit of a throwback to those old Cinderella dramas, with the downtrodden heroine being buffeted about by the whims of those wielding power over her. It didn’t employ enough of a twist to make it a fairy-tale-with-a-twist, and in that respect it wasn’t terribly original. But it provided enjoyable characters and a bunch of funny, heartwarming moments that put a grin on my face.
This drama was probably my favorite noona-romance of the year, mostly owing to Daniel Choi, who proved his devotion to Jang Nara a dozen times over by rising to the occasion and putting her first and foremost, above his own desires, even when that mean he didn’t claim credit. He swooped in to save the heroine from harm, but never in a chauvinistic, “Here, little lady, let me take care of that for you” sort of way. By using his own skill set to set the stage for her to shine on her own merit, he made himself indispensible to her in one sense, but never made her into a helpless damsel in distress.
You could argue that this is what made their relationship satisfying both on a romantic and friendship level, because they both brought different things to the table. She was the creative force, he the marketing brain. She was the talent who lacked confidence, and he was the cheerleader who urged her to believe in her ability.
Alas, the heroine proved to be one of the drama’s weaknesses, in that she remained the meek victim for much of the series, while sneakier foes cooked up a number of plots to discredit her. True, she vanquished them each time with her talent rather than wiles, making for a series of underdog triumphs. But I couldn’t help but wish for more from her, and was ultimately dissatisfied in her lack of personal growth. She did cause trouble a number of times — even if many times she was set up beforehand — and it became hard to argue with the villainness of the piece when she muttered that the heroine sure was a constant liability for the company.
Thanks to the old-school Cinderella setup that kept the heroine’s character in pristine condition throughout, she went through a fairly unremarkable — and therefore not-so-fulfilling — personal trajectory. Perhaps her frustrating static quality was paid off in the heartwarming transformation of the hero, who matured out of a petulant brat into an adult who learned how to take responsibility (though thankfully without losing any of his adorkable charm in the process). It was a satisfying twist to take away his oppa status to the seven-years-older heroine, in exchange for actually growing up. At least somebody did.
Stick, sticky, stuck: A magnet stuck to an opposing pole, whose electromagnetic forces cause a heart monitor to go haywire like an azalea-trampling chicken chases a potato sprouting flowers… wait, I lost track of this metaphor. Right, magnets. The kind that stick.
By now, you probably know whether you’re a fan of the Hong Sisters’ brand of comedy or not. Maybe their zany scenarios and tongue-tripping wordplay float your boat, or maybe they sink your battleship. After seven dramas (since 2005), I’m pretty much a forever fan, but while I expect their dramas to make me laugh and cry — sometimes simultaneously — they don’t automatically get a free pass. They’ve still got to back up the resumé with a solid show. So when they came out with “Best Love” this year, I was anticipating what new tricks they’d have up their sleeves.
What impresses me about the Hong Sisters is their ability to find new ways to keep churning out the hilarity. Their love of puns and metaphors regularly manifests itself in their fast-flying dialogue, but never has it been with such gleeful abandon as in “Best Love.”
The drama took the entertainment industry as its canvas, but added the interesting and ultimately rewarding choice to make its heroine a failed star, a has-been on the downward slope of her career. We’re used to the top stars ruling the drama landscape — gotta satisfy that wish-fulfillment quota somehow, and in the absence of chaebols a movie star will do in a pinch. But a flavor-of-the-month as a heroine, now dealing with the back end of fame, provided a host of issues not addressed by other showbiz dramas of years past.
I’ve always considered the depiction of showbiz in dramas a difficult prospect, because it’s tricky balancing the fictions of the dramaworld and the realities of what we know about the industry. The Hong Sisters went to town, poking loving fun at their own world and twisting real-world entertainment industry facts into their fictionalized version.
In a departure from the norm, the villains of the piece weren’t specific characters so much as they were the consumers of entertainment culture — netizens, fans, you, me. Whether intentional or not, that gave the drama the opportunity to challenge social conventions and the all-powerful cult of public opinion. Not head-on and on-the-nose, though, to its credit; the issue was only ever broached with a wink and a smile (and sometimes a heart-failure-induced tear). It also put forth the idea of reputation as commodity, with a monetary value that could be transferred. Like chips, cashed in to buy favorable public opinion. It was enough to make you lament the narrow-mindedness of dramaland fans… as you stepped back and traded thoughts on the drama with other fans. How’s that for a mind-tease?
Lie To Me
Sticky like… a sticker that missed having its glue applied, which makes it a pretty picture, but little more.
“Lie To Me” is what happens when you have an idea, but no story. It had a cute premise, and goodness knows the leads are fantastic at this genre, but the drama never goes beyond the concept stage: A woman lies about being married, and hijinks ensue.
For a while, there was enough promise in the setup to produce some funny bits, and who doesn’t love to see a jealous schemer literally twisted up inside in knots out of spite? I was with the couple when they were at odds, and then when they were attracted to each other. When it came time to introduce conflict, however, things fizzled might fast, leaving us to deal with a flat pop.
Thus the second half devolved into half-*ssed story turns, which became more evident the longer it went on. Almost nothing happened after the initial phase, so the plot spun its wheels with lackluster attempts to rustle up conflict in the form of jealous exes, angry brothers, meddling aunts, and basically a host of people we didn’t care about. The show did compensate with a few hot makeout sessions between the leads, but since we’d long since abandoned logic at that point, it felt more like watching two actors kissing than two characters lost in the moment.
It’s not quite my biggest disappointment of the year, but “Lie To Me” takes the cake for most disappointing misuse of actors who can do better. Yoon Eun Hye has a talent for sucking you into her pain when she cries, but Ah Jung’s tears were prompted by such puzzling reasons that you felt that those tears rang false. Kang Ji Hwan is so good at being off-the-wall and quirky (see: “Hong Gil Dong,” “Capital Scandal,” “Coffee House“) that it’s a shame he had no personality here.
No matter how hard the actors are trying, there’s no way to sell an empty plot. In that, “Lie To Me” felt like a collection of writer’s B-sides, a plate of leftovers not used by a better rom-com, and partaking resulted in a feeling of dissatisfied fullness.
How sticky? Like a piece of gum stuck in hair. I could get rid of it, but it would require cutting out of piece of myself.
Though “City Hunter” was not without its flaws, of the dramas this year it hit the closest to the perfect viewing experience for me, balancing mystery, action, intrigue, humor, and emotion for a thrill ride with heart. The drama had polish: It was gorgeously directed, with a soundtrack to complement its sharp cinematography, which alternately evoked moodiness and light-hearted caper fun.
The series also gave us a hero in moral conflict, a badass villain with a deep emotional tie to our hero (not some cartoonish baddie twirling his mustache from afar, he), a heroine who saved the hero right back, and a rival determined to bring down the hero who, as it turns out, shared a lot of the same ideals as he did of what constituted right and wrong. That lawman-vigilante dynamic was one of the drama’s fortes, presenting the ostensible antagonists as two sides of the same coin; it was exciting to see them fighting each other while cheering for them to team up at the same time.
Structurally, “City Hunter” was well-designed with mini-arcs to carry the show, allowing for a smart balance between the overarching revenge and the smaller, continual payoffs along the way. While the romance took a backseat after City Hunter and Nana Bear reached an understanding, I wasn’t disappointed, because the revenge was always at the crux of the series. (Although while the romantic tension ran high, it provided some thrilling conflicts, resulting in some life-and-death near-misses that felt way too near for comfort.)
The show also became something of an issue-raiser, taking on hot topics in the current cultural consciousness like the draft, tuition scams, corrupt politicians, and the like. It didn’t trumpet its causes with self-importance, but allowed the plot to convey the theme, giving viewers a vicarious thrill when the masked avenger swooped in and meted justice. Perhaps real life couldn’t produce such a vigilante hero, but we could cheer the fictional version.
“City Hunter” is one of the more successful examples of manga-to-drama adaptations, in that it took the basic premise of the old property and managed to make it its own, with a distinctly Korean-drama flavor. The world of the show had a satisfying richness to it; there was so much potential for future stories with all the characters, each with depth and dimension, making it perfect for episodic stories fitting into a larger, seasonal arc.
Perhaps diehard fans of the original “City Hunter” may find fault with the new version, but I think it was a smart move to turn it into a prequel of sorts, rather than attempt to re-create the original in a new setting and a new era. Thus while the overall arc resolved to provide an element of closure, it didn’t tie up everything in double-knotted bows — because ostensibly there’d be a series to follow, aka the original version of “City Hunter.” Or, you know, a sequel to this one. JUST SAYIN’.
Sticky Quotient: Like a thorny rose… with most of its thorns removed. You’re expecting sharp edges, but they’ve been dulled for you.
“Miss Ripley” had one of the more complex heroines of the year, if you can call Lee Da Hae’s Miri a heroine. Abrasive, manipulative, and morally flawed, Miri lied and cheated her way to the top (okay, middle-ish) and would have continued if her house of cards hadn’t come crashing down on top of her. But even still, you couldn’t quite call her anti-heroine material, either, and the exercise of watching Miri toe that line of likability was intriguing. At any given moment, even I didn’t know how I felt about her, so it’s no surprise that she was a cipher to the characters in her orbit.
“Miss Ripley” was strongest on the acting front, displaying some real clunkers in execution in its directing. Oy, that soundtrack. Blared indiscriminately over scenes with little restraint, it’s a classic example of distracting excess. I’ll never be able to hear “Carmen” without thinking of Miri’s ever-present Plotting Eyes and Gasps of Shock.
Lee Da Hae has always shown promise, but hasn’t been too lucky with her last few projects, so this drama marked her triumphant return. And despite a tendency to overact in early episodes, she played Miri with intensity and desperation that drew you in. She could be vulnerable one moment, stirring sympathy when her harsh upbringing was referenced, but then she’d turn around and be cruel and manipulative. I may not have liked Miri, but the drama had the curious effect of making me simultaneously wish for her to be caught in her lies and to get away with them.
Where “Miss Ripley” missed out on a golden opportunity is in abandoning its initial setup pitting Miri and Hee Joo as ideological opposites, as well as Yoo Hyun versus Myung Hoon. Perhaps it was the live-shoot that steered the drama away from that plan, toward a more dramatic showdown between Miri and her absentee mother. That may not be a bad choice, since it supplied us with plenty of memorable confrontations, but it did mean that the drama ditched its light/dark premise, faded out Kang Hye Jung and Kim Seung Woo’s characters, and opted to pursue familiar makjang convention instead with birth secrets and faux-incest.
I wasn’t dissatisfied with the mother storyline, because it gave us some riveting performances between Lee Da- Hae and Choi Myung Gil, but I did lament the loss of thematic resonance. Nowhere was this lopsided development more obvious than in the finale, whose echo of the opening sequence highlighted Kim Seung Woo’s glaring absence from the resolution.
As a result, the drama ends with a pat ending that offers hope for all its characters (some of it unmerited, frankly), but doesn’t necessary say something. Not all dramas require a message, but “Miss Ripley” felt curiously devoid of one, contrary to its beginnings. Blame the live-shoot: Giving the gift of conflict, taking away dramatic purpose.
Myung-wol the Spy
Sticky or not? So you’ve got this attractive plate of doughnuts, right? Warm, inviting, looking gooey and snackable. Only the plate gets knocked over by that exhausted actress who isn’t allowed to sleep because she’s off shooting this insane drama, leaving an unsightly stain that won’t come out and feels unpleasantly tacky to the touch, so now you put a flowerpot over the spot to keep it out of sight and mind. That’s this drama.
Was “Myung-wol the Spy” about Hallyu? Undercover spies? North Korean satire? Killing the star, or marrying him? These are questions I had at the outset, expecting that the drama would provide the answers. Sadly, they’re the same questions that lingered after its end.
“Myung-wol” frustrates me not because it was bad, but because it showed signs of being so much better. Wasting potential always aggrieves me more than lacking it in the first place; you get your hopes up, then Drama kicks them off a cliff, left to dangle with all its abandoned plotlines. “Myung-wol’s” earlier episodes showed enough promise that I can still picture what could, should, have been. There was dark humor, farce, mystery, and a hilarious spotlight on Hallyu as both the primary blight on today’s youth and the answer to a nation’s problems. Plus, that loopy satirization of North versus South tensions (no cow too sacred, don’tcha know).
Instead, the drama opted for a tonal shift, pursued some dead ends, and dropped threads (remember the South Korean spies?). Maybe it was trying to bolster flagging ratings, or maybe it didn’t set sail with a clear-enough route. In any case, it lost its direction and with it went its charm.
Still, “Myung-wol the Spy“ did end up being quite memorable, albeit not for its content. Rather, the drama’s infamous “Han Ye Seul situation” became the talk of the town and dominated headlines, shining a light on the problematic drama-production machine, namely the live shoot system that subjects many a production to chaotic schedules and unreasonable working conditions. Han Ye Seul bore the brunt of the criticism after she walked off set, but she opened a can of worms that has long needed opening, setting off industry dialogue about a need to reform. Shortly afterward, other actors spoke up about the miserable conditions they’d seen or experienced firsthand, joining the call for change.
For a lackluster drama with poor ratings and a forgettable plot, “Myung-wol” sure left a mark on the entertainment industry. Even if it wasn’t for the reasons it would have liked.
The Princess’s Man
Sticky crisis! The best way to deal with something this sticky: Eat it all up, and wish for more.
“The Princess’s Man” was my favorite surprise of the year, defying my expectations and positively sweeping me up in its lush, suspenseful thrall. I hadn’t doubted that this premium sageuk could pull out good acting and a solid plot, but I was bracing myself for weepy, mournful excess.
Instead of dolor and drear, “The Princess’s Man” produced fierce conflict, a swift pace, and some of the strongest characters of the year. The political maneuverings were just as thrilling as the romance and sometimes more so. But it wasn’t one element outshining the other, so much as it was the drama doing a damn good job of intertwining the two threads — the usurper’s bloody ambition to be king, and his daughter’s love for his enemy — into one inextricable conflict. You couldn’t free those two issues from each other, because they represented two sides of one coin. The princess was no petulant lovestruck adolescent, with starry eyes only for her lover, but a woman whose own code of honor aligned with her father’s enemy (who was upright in the face of her father’s villainy), and that’s what made the problem so damn compelling.
Often in dramas, intrigue can draw out and wear thin, leaving you wondering why something must be so. In this drama, you not only understood why these two sides were in irrevocable discord, you nigh well felt the terrible conflict yourself, your heart clenching along with the characters caught between loyalties, between loves. Every episode sped along with major developments that kept you on the edge of your seat, hooked. The artful cliffhangers had you cursing the screen, or if you were lucky, reaching for the next installment.
The drama featured beautiful landscapes, beautiful costumes, and beautiful music, but more than that it was populated by beautiful, complex relationships. Three friends split apart by one’s alliance with the dark side, yet never quite able to break old loyalties. A villainous father doting on his loving daughter. That daughter falling for his righteous enemy’s son, torn by filial love warring with her own moral compass. That enemy’s son struggling to reconcile his love for that woman with his hatred of her father. One princess resenting the other, and then the two aligning as sisters. Families slaughtered by the power-hungry, giving way to new families springing up among friends, bound by honor and ideology. And in the end, proof of love and faith standing tall, even in the face of death. *Tear* It’s epic and moving and intense.
As the star-crossed lovers, Moon Chae Won and Park Shi Hoo both turned in career-best performances; both were impassioned and fierce in a way that made you feel for their characters. She was one of my favorite characters of the year, pure verve and fire despite lacking power in a world where daughters and wives were mere shadows of their men. And he earned his hero edit with a transformation from privileged charm to tortured gravitas. (And that mane of glory! With abs of glory to match!)
Above and beyond their individual performances, though, was the chemistry they had together. Of all the recent dramas I’ve seen, theirs was probably the most compelling romance, one that made you believe in their connection and their love. One that went deeper than attraction and passion and bespoke a marriage of true minds. It wasn’t chemistry in the way that you wished for two actors to date in real life, but in the way that made you wistful, wishing these characters could be real people, because their love deserved to transcend the realm of fiction.
Scent of a Woman
Mild- to medium-sticky: Rice cake sticky. There’s some substance to the content, but no lingering stickiness.
For being a story about being given a death sentence, “Scent of a Woman” was remarkably uplifting. Despite following the heroine’s gradual decline as her cancer progressed, the focus remained on her determination to make her time count, to claim as much happiness for herself and her loved ones.
“Scent of a Woman” boasted prettier-than-average visuals, and an evocative soundtrack that was by turns breezy and moody. It also notably wove its tango motif into a greater thematic context, allowing the dance scenes to mark significant moments of character development. In fact, the tangoing conveyed more heat than the makeout sessions, and wrung more tears than death scenes.
Marked by strong acting performances by leads Kim Sun Ah, Lee Dong Wook, and Eom Ki Joon, it’s a shame that so much of the middle stretch was bogged down by useless angst. Frankly, in a drama about a woman who’s dying, pissy parents only get to carry a certain amount of weight as sources of conflict. The ticking clock was a much greater concern for her and for us, making the chaebol meddlers a frustrating waste of time.
It was both refreshing and liberating, though, that this drama gave the heroine license to put herself first. Dramas historically love to canonize the self-sacrificial heroine, placing on pedestals the type of long-suffering women who bear their cancer diagnosis with stoic fortitude. (See: Choi Jin Shil in “A Rosy Life.”) I loved that Yeon Jae (Kim Sun Ah) refused to spend another second being the sacrificing wallflower, since she’d wasted too much time already. The woman’s got things to do, things to check off her list.
To that end, the bucket list served as a symbol of that goal: The items themselves were unimportant; what counted was the fact that they were there. And in a lovely twist, the bucket list got checked off and completed…and extended, because as long as the heroine had life to live, she wouldn’t stop approaching it with purpose. If closing that book (literally) would be tantamount to being ready to die, then this is a heroine who would never be ready to die. But in taking every day without regrets, she’d know that whenever that day came, she’d be as ready as she’d ever be. A worthy lesson for us all.
Stick-o-meter: Cotton candy — sticky and sweet in the mouth, dissolving quickly into air.
“Can’t Lose” reminds me of 2008′s “Love & Marriage,” in that it’s a sweet drama about finding love amidst divorce and getting it right the second time around, which is a nice sentiment that gives us some variety from the prevailing romantic ideal of finding your bliss just that once.
With the happily ever after a foregone conclusion, “Can’t Lose” wasn’t about the realization of love but how to keep it going in the face of some unsexy, unromantic daily tribulations. The conflicts were therefore small but rooted in the realistic, like what to do if your wife is a slob, or your husband’s a nag. What happens when you make vows to support each other but didn’t quite realize how far that promise would take you? Or when communication breaks down and romantic love isn’t enough to hold two people together?
There was a refreshing lack of evil characters or scheming villains to get in our characters’ way, meaning that the couple was their own biggest stumbling block. Their love was never in question, and it was their mismatched personalities that provided most of the conflict, along with some basic issues of trust, loyalty, and reliability — you know, the stuff of real marriage.
Solid chemistry between Choi Ji Woo and Yoon Sang Hyun provided plenty of bickering cuteness, as well as some heartfelt moments of miscommunication. They made you believe these were two people who wanted to be together, but really needed to work things out before that could happen. Falling in love was the easy part. Living together? Now there’s the drama.
Stickiness: Too short to get under your skin, but has enough stick to be memorable while it lasts.
“Girl K” is an example of style becoming substance, because let’s face it, coolness is a huge component of this drama. Er, mini-drama. Er, whatever you call it. (It was touted as a TV movie, broadcast in three hour-long episodes.) The show is blood, guns, and gore, delivered in an artful spray, with a side order of gratuitous boobies for fun.
There’s a little more to that, of course, with the teenage girl’s revenge story providing the backbone to the plot. The show constructed just enough of a spine to bear that premise — plus a lot of combat flash — but really, the story itself was paper-thin: If you thought too hard, you might tear holes in it.
Even so, despite the thinness of “Girl K” itself, it made me wish for more, because the concept could support so much more. You’ve got a teenager juggling school with her assassin-by-night secret identity. Keeping your cover with the cute boy whose idea of danger is skipping class to play hooky at the fair. Being fed a line about working for good, while being cultivated as a secret weapon. Belatedly realizing the nefarious underpinnings of the organization you work for. Finding out that there are strings that come with knowledge of your true parentage. Being betrayed by your mentor. All these elements are there in “Girl K”, capable of being teased into a richer version.
It was thanks to the portrayal of the heroine that there was an emotional throughline to the short series; the world is surreal and stylistically exaggerated, requiring that kind of connection to ground it in emotion. Rookie actress Han Groo earned comparisons to Ha Ji Won for her ass-kicking portrayal of the young killer, hinting at a bright future ahead. And while “Girl K” was too short to get truly invested in the journey — it was over almost as soon as it began — it did offer some stylish, escapist fun.
Sticky like adhesive tape, soaked in water. What you end up with is a floppy strip of material, sadly bereft of purpose.
“Poseidon” never really had a shot, did it? After suffering numerous filming delays and losing all of its initial cast, it had scant weeks to pull together a new cast and find a new direction. I was rooting for it to defy the odds and land on its feet, but unsurprisingly, it fell way short of the mark.
RIght off the bat, “Poseidon” suffered from a problem of tone. As an action drama set within the Coast Guard, it aimed for cool but came off cheesy, though not enough to pull off campy fun.
Too much emphasis was placed on a cartoonish Big Bad that we never cared about, and the drama took forever to hit upon a storyline to give viewers an emotional connection to the characters. There are certain shows you might watch, glossing over the questionable mechanics of the crime plot in favor of the leads’ chemistry, or the fun banter, or the clever plotting. “Poseidon” falls into that category of awkward overarching crime mystery, but doesn’t compensate enough with the other factors, either.
I stuck around out of a sheer superficial desire to see Lee Shi Young and Siwon developing their chemistry onscreen, and it did come, sort of. There were signs of a budding bromance between Siwon and Yunho, former rival-buddies now separated by a murder case and a demotion. Alas, poor acting hindered that relationship from blossoming as it could have, leaving it firmly in the category of What Could Have Beens.
Ultimately, this may not be an utter failure for Siwon, who’s still building up his resumé with leading roles and could probably take lessons away from this experience. It would have been a bigger disappointment with higher-profile actors like Eric, Kim Kang Woo, and Kim Ok Bin. Then again, in their hands, maybe it would’ve been a better drama.
High Kick: Counterattack of the Short Legs
Individually not that sticky, but pile ‘em all together and good luck prying them apart.
Who knew that a daily sitcom would provide some of the most tug-on-your-heart moments of emotion and poignancy this year?
“High Kick 3” is the rare instance where I don’t begrudge the show for its length. In fact, far from doubting whether the show will have enough material to fill 120 episodes, I’m looking forward to each installment and wondering if the show will manage to fit in everything I want it to cover by the time it wraps up early next year.
Most shows with an episode count of 100+ inevitably fall back on filler material, recycling the same old conflicts, trotting out makjang staples like bitchy mothers-in-law, jealous exes, and the like. Heck, some miniseries fall prey to the same tendencies. “High Kick 3,” on the other hand, makes use of its sizable cast and episode count to explore a number of relationships. Characters alternate between playing background roles to stepping into the spotlight, allowing everyone their moment to shine.
Thanks to this rotating format, the show gives its characters space to breathe and grow and feel like real people you may know in real life.
At the heart of the show is the Ahn family with their Yoon brother satellites (although it’s heartwarming to see the family expanding to include the neighbors, resulting into a merged super-family), and like a real family, they bicker and clash, but they always have each other’s backs. Like in our real lives, sometimes the most significant moments aren’t the ones dripping with Drama Grandeur, but can be found in small words of encouragement that turn around a bad day, or a moment of connection with an unexpected kindred spirit. This “High Kick” may have short legs, but it makes up for it with and oversize heart.
Sticky-meter: I’m not sticky, I’m smooth like a fine wine (or is it?), and just as sultry.
Of the two words in the attention-grabbing title, you’d think vampire would be the more prominent feature of the series, but as it turns out, the prosecutor is what keeps this slick, stylish procedural ticking. That and a seriously cool visual sensibility, marked by a cool, dark palette and some of the most beautiful blood splatters you’ve seen on TV.
Adding to the watchability factor is a wry sense of humor to undercut the darkness of murder, embodied in perhaps the sexiest untouchable boss ever, Mr. Vampire Prosecutor himself (Yeon Jung Hoon, reinventing himself as a smart, enigmatic vampire who’s really more like a teddy bear with fangs. A really hot, charming teddy bear). You can’t blame his trusty prosecutor teammate (Lee Young Ah) for getting flustered around him, or his bromantic cop partner (Lee Won Jong) for sticking close by his side. Or even the shameless coroner for flashing some boob, leg, or body part of the day to get his attention, for that matter.
The genre fan in me wished for more vampire, but acknowledges that the mostly-procedural element is the source of “Vampire Prosecutor’s” clever crimes, with their twist reveals. The supernatural factor, for the most part, is sprinkled through the episodes but takes a backseat to the straight-up mystery plot at hand. In fact, in a number of cases, the psychometry — Mr. Hottie Vampire’s blood visions — aren’t even crucial to the case. Without the vamp factor, this drama could have still succeeded as a smart crime show boasting cases unraveling with Agatha Christie-like layers.
Which isn’t to say that the vampire arc doesn’t add to the show, and it’s the ramping up of this beat that makes recent episodes particularly engage. It’s coming to close as we find ourselves one episode shy of a season, and the finale will be the determinant of whether the show made the most of its potential. Even if that answer turns out to be no, “Vampire Prosecutor” will have already made its mark as the highest-ranking cable drama thus far (numbers topping 4%), and a darkly funny, mind-engaging genre hybrid.
Thousand Day Promise
Stickiness Quotient: Like gum on your shoe; sticky at first, but losing its hold with successive steps.
You don’t go into a drama about a 30-year-old woman with Alzheimer’s expecting rollickin’ good times. And if that topic isn’t enough to warn you of the heartache ahead, we have appropriately named songs on the soundtrack to drive home the point, titled “Despair,” “Pain,” “Doubt,” “Disease,” “Isolation.” Granted, there’s also “Smile Again” and “Blessing,” but I think the proportion of tears to cheers is fairly apparent.
Coming from veteran scribe Kim Soo Hyun, a writer’s writer if ever there was one, “Thousand Day Promise” is full of weighty material peppered with lyrical, lilting passages. There’s a poetry to the writing, particularly the dark, anguished internal thoughts of our heroine, the prickly Seo Yeon, masterfully played by a commanding Su Ae. (Su Ae once again proves that she is a force to be reckoned with, portraying all of Seo Yeon’s fear, anger, bitterness, defensiveness, joy, and love with a richness of expression that proves why she’s one of the best of her generation.)
Yet I can’t help but feel that “Thousand Day Promise” is a drama bogged down in its importance. There’s so much extremity of emotion flying around that I’ve detached from it, watching it more as an exercise of acting than a story I care about. Some of that is due to the bloated writing; I feel like there’s a good drama in here, but it’s cluttered with dead weight, dulling its overall effect. The writing is incisive and profound when it’s intended to be, but when it’s fixated on the mundane, it feels as incessant as Aunt’s chatter.
It’s too bad that Kim Rae Won’s big army comeback had him playing such an incidental character. He’s not incidental to Seo Yeon, of course, but basically he’s an object for her to react against and to. Almost anybody could have played Ji Hyung, which makes Kim Rae Won’s warm, genuine depth as an actor wasted in the role. The romantic angle thus gets eclipsed by the brotherly love shown by Lee Sang Woo (the best oppa in the world) and Park Yoo Hwan (so vulnerable, anguished, and loving).
But all’s not gloom and tears, because the drama has interspersed Seo Yeon’s declining memory with reminders that she is surrounded by love, and suggesting that perhaps she’ll get to leave her mark on the world after all, long after she’s ceased to remember it herself.
Flower Boy Ramyun Shop
Sticky survey says: Why hello there, Superglue. You here for the long haul?
Though far from realistic, “Flower Boy Ramyun Shop” is the closest I’ve seen a drama come in recent years to capturing that youthful giddiness of young romance in the way of soonjung manhwas, aka shojo manga, aka those “pure comics” targeted to a largely female, youthful audience.
Characterized by a zany sense of humor — at times witty, at others quirky and random — “Ramyun Shop” is actually more than the fluff it presents itself as. Marketed as a eye-candy lightweight, it’s a better-written drama than you might suppose at first glance, with each episode converging on a theme that expresses itself in witty dialogue, extended metaphors, and occasionally a symbolic device. That it wraps this all up in an easy-breezy, fast-flowing plot means that this drama has successfully managed to seem effortless, without being effortless.
The show owes a lot to Jung Il Woo for its appeal, both in bringing the target audience and in bringing a ridiculous character to live and turning him into a living, breathing, emoting manchild you can’t help but feel for. It’s to Jung’s credit that he has not one noteworthy character but two, with his “49 Days” Scheduler stealing scenes left and right in that show.
With three episodes left to go, the jury’s still out on how this drama will shake out, so I’m reserving judgment on its overall score. But a drama that recalls the giddy flush of youth and ushers in laugh-out-loud hilarity will always be welcome in my book.
It’s interesting to me that “Ramyun Shop” feels like a drama written for the younger generation, by the younger generation. The cultural references, the use of slang, the attitudes — they bespeak a plugged-into-this-generation vibe that’s different from other trendies. No wonder, then, that it’s been such a hit with the teenage and twentysomething viewership, which shows that tvN’s onto something with their marketing strategy. But I say, just keep backing up the pretty with satisfying stories — you’ll capture that audience and then some.
Tree With Deep Roots
Stickiness: Sticky in the brain, not so much in the heart.
“Tree With Deep Roots” has been collecting quite a bit of praise, and deservedly so. It’s sharply directed, tightly scripted, and marked by a number of top-notch acting performances. (Han Seok Kyu in particular is wonderful as the king who cares deeply, determined to prove that words can achieve what brute force cannot.) There’s also suspense, darkness, and a densely plotted story that make each episode rich with brain-tickling mystery.
There’s a taut, suspenseful feel to the show that keeps you on edge, even when the scene is a mere conversation. But when conversations have such high stakes, you can’t help but feel invested in the outcome of a philosophical debate, because in this world, rhetoric can bear as much weight as action, and carry just as much consequence.
All those superlatives aside, I do find that the drama leaves me a little cold. Which is fine; not every show has to be a sentimental experience. It’s a cerebral thriller, and where other dramas give us eye candy, this drama offers up a serving of brain candy.
What this means is that I’m consistently impressed with this drama, but it’s a bit like admiring a piece of artwork from afar; coolly appraising, emotions unengaged. It doesn’t lessen the experience for me, but it is why I can feel confident declaring “Tree” one of the year’s best dramas without it necessarily being my favorite.
Me Too, Flower!
Sticky factor: The kind that grows on you, unsuspectingly.
We’re ten episodes into “Me Too, Flower” at this point, which isn’t enough to deliver a final verdict, but gives me enough basis to consider it one of the overlooked finds of the year. The viewership is relatively small, but possesses enough enthusiasm to put “Me Too, Flower” into the class of mania dramas (aka, those with cult followings).
The series is populated by a quirky mix of characters, all with their own peculiarities that make them interesting. The writer has been juggling weightier issues with a lighter touch, which brings out poignancy in moments without a heavy hand. The heroine laugh-crying over a betrayal has the queer effect of engaging my sympathies more effectively than had she sunk into abject misery, just as the hero’s tendency to hide his fears behind a cheeky quip makes his eventual breakdown more rewarding when he finally shares his burden with the heroine. Dialogue tends to be witty and thoughtful.
This is the most I’ve liked Lee Jia (because generally I haven’t) since her debut in “Legend“; she juggles Bong Sun’s self-hatred, surliness, and girlish hopes well, and she’s got great chemistry with Yoon Shi Yoon, who’s hitting it out of the park with really solid turn-on-a-dime acting. Because it must be said, yes, I still think he looks too young, and yes, that is unfortunately a thought that intrudes on my drama-watching. It’s not so bad when he’s with Lee Jia, but it tends to be inescapable in his scenes with Han Go Eun, which have taken on uncomfortable “Mrs. Robinson” overtones for me. It’s unfortunate, but in a visual medium, you can’t get away from appearance-based impressions, and I can understand if other viewers are tripping on it as well.
As with “My Princess,” conflicts hinging upon a single meddling force tend to get real old, real fast. That’s the issue we’re facing now, with one character supplying most of the trouble, which muddies what began as an unconventional drama and sends it into the land of tired clichés. Thankfully, we still have the couple’s trust issues to explore, as well as their respective issues with the world: Bong Sun’s depression, and Jae Hee’s fear of society. If the drama can pull back on the tedious Evil Madam pulling the strings and plotting breakups, and instead bring us back to the central issues, perhaps it can reclaim its earlier charm.
And that concludes another year (phew!) in dramas. Stay tuned for more reviews ahead!